<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reporting mass tax evasion: Negative Gearing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nathan-lee.com/blog/2010/04/14/reporting-mass-tax-evasion-negative-gearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nathan-lee.com/blog/2010/04/14/reporting-mass-tax-evasion-negative-gearing/</link>
	<description>Nathan musing, ranting and raving about the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:55:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Lee &#8211; Bank fee whinging &#8211; A published SMH letter</title>
		<link>http://nathan-lee.com/blog/2010/04/14/reporting-mass-tax-evasion-negative-gearing/comment-page-1/#comment-3245</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Lee &#8211; Bank fee whinging &#8211; A published SMH letter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 13:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathan-lee.com/blog/?p=1314#comment-3245</guid>
		<description>[...] As I said, maybe they can use some of those tax breaks (for negative gearing) or blatant vote buying handouts (1st homeowner&#8217;s grants). If you think the whining is bad now, just wait til these mortgage owners start learning about negative equity. That and politicians seem to forget mortgage owners are in the minority, though I guess most of them are taking advantage of the generous tax scams available to investment property via negative gearing. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I said, maybe they can use some of those tax breaks (for negative gearing) or blatant vote buying handouts (1st homeowner&#8217;s grants). If you think the whining is bad now, just wait til these mortgage owners start learning about negative equity. That and politicians seem to forget mortgage owners are in the minority, though I guess most of them are taking advantage of the generous tax scams available to investment property via negative gearing. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathan-lee.com/blog/2010/04/14/reporting-mass-tax-evasion-negative-gearing/comment-page-1/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 05:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathan-lee.com/blog/?p=1314#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>Actually got back a rather dull letter. Humour opportunity fail treasury letter writing guy. Tut tut..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually got back a rather dull letter. Humour opportunity fail treasury letter writing guy. Tut tut..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://nathan-lee.com/blog/2010/04/14/reporting-mass-tax-evasion-negative-gearing/comment-page-1/#comment-1781</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nathan-lee.com/blog/?p=1314#comment-1781</guid>
		<description>In response to: http://www.smh.com.au/business/negative-gearing-is-safe-from-tax-review-treasurer-hints-20100326-r34t.html
Fired off an email to the treasurer (or his lackeys trawling through emails anyhow)..

To the office of the Treasurer,
I would urge that you consider removing the tax breaks afforded to negative gearing of property.

This concept is by far the most cited way I&#039;ve heard to avoid paying tax. Comments like &quot;look at all the tax we pay that goes to the government, but we can write that off if we get an investment property&quot; are common.

This lost revenue then places extra burden on anyone else who does not have investment properties with which to escape paying fair taxes. I would rather have the money going to community rather than feeding bank profits.

Additionally it appears to create an environment of higher housing prices which require mortgages far beyond the possible rental return (further creating difficulties for those wishing to actually enter the market).

At very least the benefits of negative gearing should be restricted to newly created properties only. This would create an incentive for new property development rather than simply funnelling tax dollars into bank interest payments and inflating house prices.

I suspect with the removal of investment properties allowing people to write off tens of thousands up to hundreds of dollars tax we&#039;d be able to lower income taxes.
Regards,
Nathan Lee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to: <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/business/negative-gearing-is-safe-from-tax-review-treasurer-hints-20100326-r34t.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/business/negative-gearing-is-safe-from-tax-review-treasurer-hints-20100326-r34t.html</a><br />
Fired off an email to the treasurer (or his lackeys trawling through emails anyhow)..</p>
<p>To the office of the Treasurer,<br />
I would urge that you consider removing the tax breaks afforded to negative gearing of property.</p>
<p>This concept is by far the most cited way I&#8217;ve heard to avoid paying tax. Comments like &#8220;look at all the tax we pay that goes to the government, but we can write that off if we get an investment property&#8221; are common.</p>
<p>This lost revenue then places extra burden on anyone else who does not have investment properties with which to escape paying fair taxes. I would rather have the money going to community rather than feeding bank profits.</p>
<p>Additionally it appears to create an environment of higher housing prices which require mortgages far beyond the possible rental return (further creating difficulties for those wishing to actually enter the market).</p>
<p>At very least the benefits of negative gearing should be restricted to newly created properties only. This would create an incentive for new property development rather than simply funnelling tax dollars into bank interest payments and inflating house prices.</p>
<p>I suspect with the removal of investment properties allowing people to write off tens of thousands up to hundreds of dollars tax we&#8217;d be able to lower income taxes.<br />
Regards,<br />
Nathan Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

